Responsibility of Employers for Acts of Employees

Another employee of your paper mill, Hotspur, steals a shipment of wood pulp for your family to make a motion you with initiative to secure new resources for free. Unfortunately, he runs down a pedestrian cover properly in the crosswalk on his way back to your factory, injuring her. If the pedestrian sues your bon ton can there be a recovery for the speck? Discuss your answer. The employee who steal the shipment will cause the go with to be amenable for the recovery for the injury. I believe that this is a case of the principle of replyeat superior.This is Latin for let the master respond. The employee is an agent of the smart set therefore the employer is responsible for their actions. tear down though the employer had no root of knowing what the agent was going to do, the company is still liable for his/her actions. As noteworthy in the text, the following example was given, If a truck driver, the employee of a delivery firm, negligently runs a red light and injures a pedestrian, the owner of the truck is liable for the injury (Hallowell & Miller, 2012).In addition, the employee could be over(p) because of his/her actions while beingness employed as an agent. The employee could be terminated because an injury or possible remainder occurred that was not what the agent was contracted to do. The employee could withal be prosecuted because the wood pulp was stolen. Even though it was an effort to impress the company it is still punishable by lawfulness because the goods were stolen, not free.